529 Plan Alternatives: UMGA, Roth IRA, And More

The 529 plan was designed specifically for education savings, offering tax-free growth and tax-free withdrawals for qualified education expenses. Many states also provide tax deductions or credits for contributions.

Despite these advantages, some families hesitate to commit. Concerns about what happens if a child does not attend college, limitations on investment choices, or uncertainty about future expenses push some parents to explore other options.

Alternatives such as UGMA/UTMA custodial accounts, Roth IRAs, or savings bonds can provide more flexibility. However, each comes with tradeoffs that influence financial aid eligibility, tax treatment, and long-term wealth planning.

Here are the main 529 plan alternatives, along with the pros and cons of each.

UGMA and UTMA Accounts (Custodial Brokerage Accounts)

Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (UGMA) and Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA) accounts are custodial investment accounts set up for children. Parents or guardians control the account until the child reaches the age of majority, typically 18 or 21 depending on state law.

These accounts allow investments in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or ETFs, offering far more flexibility than most 529 plans. The funds can be used for any purpose that benefits the child, not just education.

Pros:

• Wide investment options compared with the limited menus of many 529 providers.
• No restrictions on how the money is spent. The funds could cover education, but also a first car, housing, or other expenses.
• No contribution limits. Families can save and invest as much as they want, though large gifts may trigger federal gift tax rules.

Cons:

• Earnings are taxed annually and may fall under the “kiddie tax,” where unearned income above a certain threshold is taxed at the parent’s rate.
• For financial aid purposes, custodial accounts are considered student-owned assets, which can sharply reduce aid eligibility.
• Once the child becomes a legal adult, they gain full control of the funds, regardless of the parents’ intentions.

For families prioritizing flexibility, UGMA and UTMA accounts can be attractive. But the financial aid implications and lack of tax advantages make them less efficient for college savings compared with 529 plans.

Roth IRA

Though primarily a retirement vehicle, Roth IRAs have become an option some families consider for college savings. Contributions grow tax-free, and withdrawals of contributions can be taken at any time. If the funds are used for higher education expenses, the 10% penalty on early withdrawals of earnings is waived.

Two approaches exist: a parent may use their own Roth IRA, or a child with earned income can open one in their name. However, both have limitations as well.

Pros:

• Withdrawn contributions are always tax- and penalty-free.
• Using funds for higher education avoids the early withdrawal penalty on earnings.
• Retirement accounts are generally not counted as assets on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), which can improve financial aid outcomes.
• Wide investment options allow long-term growth potential.

Cons:

• Children must have earned income to contribute to a Roth IRA, which can limit how much is saved in early years. Most children don’t begin to start earning wages until 16 or so, meaning that the time to grow an investment account before college is short.
• Withdrawals for education are treated as income on the FAFSA in later years, potentially reducing aid in subsequent years.
• Using retirement funds for college carries opportunity costs, since money withdrawn cannot keep compounding for retirement.
• Parents who use their Roth IRA will see funds withdrawn during prime compound growth years – potentially impacting retirement dramatically.

For parents with limited retirement savings, we recommend prioritizing retirement over college funding (remember our YES model on the order of operations to save for college). But for families with ample retirement resources, a Roth IRA can offer tax advantages and flexibility.

Coverdell

Coverdell Education Savings Accounts were once a popular way to save for education, but they have largely been overshadowed by 529 plans. Families can contribute up to $2,000 per year, and the funds grow tax-free as long as they are used for qualified education expenses.

Unlike 529 plans, Coverdells can be applied to a wider set of K-12 education costs, which makes them attractive to families with private school expenses. However, the relatively low contribution cap and income limits make them less practical for long-term college funding. In addition, the account must generally be spent before the beneficiary reaches age 30, or taxes and penalties may apply.

Pros:

• Tax-free growth and withdrawals for qualified education expenses.
• Can be used for both K-12 and college costs.
• Broader investment choices than many 529 plans.

Cons:

• Low contribution limit of $2,000 per beneficiary per year.
• Income limits restrict higher-earning families from contributing.
• Must be used before the beneficiary turns 30 (with some exceptions).

Life Insurance Products (Whole Life or IULs)

Some financial advisors or insurance agents promote whole life or universal life insurance as an education savings vehicle, highlighting the policy’s cash value component. 

While it’s true that cash value grows tax-deferred and can be borrowed against for tuition or other expenses, these policies come with steep costs. Premiums are high, returns are modest, and families often discover that a significant portion of contributions goes toward fees. The end result is that most families over-pay for underperformance. 

While the death benefit provides a form of protection, we recommend avoiding life insurance as a primary college savings tool.

For nearly all families, lower-cost and tax-advantaged accounts like 529 plans are far better suited to building education funds.

Pros:

• Cash value grows tax-deferred and can be borrowed against.
• Offers a death benefit in addition to savings features.
• Funds can be used for any purpose, not just education.

Cons:

• High fees and commissions compared to investment accounts.
• Cash value growth is typically slow and may lag the stock market.
• Not designed primarily as an education savings tool, despite sales pitches.

Read our full guide on why you should generally avoid IULs anyway.

Savings Bonds (Series EE and I Bonds)

Savings bonds are a traditional way to put money aside for education. Series EE bonds earn a fixed rate of interest, while Series I bonds are tied to inflation.

The main advantage is their safety: they are backed by the U.S. Treasury, making them virtually risk-free. When used for qualified higher education expenses, the interest may also be exempt from federal income tax.

However, the returns are typically far lower than what families might earn from stock-based investments in a 529 plan or custodial account. Income restrictions can also limit the tax benefits. For families seeking maximum safety or a supplement to other savings methods, bonds remain a conservative option.

Pros:

• Very safe and backed by the U.S. government.
• Interest may be tax-free when used for qualified higher education expenses.
• Easy to purchase and manage through TreasuryDirect.

Cons:

• Low returns compared to stocks and index funds.
• Tedious to cash out paper savings bonds.
• Interest rates on EE bonds are fixed and can be minimal.
• Income limits apply for tax-free treatment of earnings.

Final Thoughts

Families thinking about alternatives to 529 plans should weigh three main factors: taxes, financial aid impact, and long-term flexibility.

• Taxes: 529 plans and Roth IRAs both offer tax-free growth and qualified withdrawals, while custodial accounts face annual taxation.
• Financial aid: Assets in 529 plans are treated more favorably than custodial accounts, which can sharply reduce aid eligibility.
• Flexibility: Custodial accounts allow spending for any purpose. Roth IRAs allow penalty-free withdrawals for education, but retirement should come first.

No single account is right for every family but generally for education, the 529 plan is best. 

The end choice depends on a household’s goals, income level, tax situation, and the likelihood of needing federal aid.

For many, a 529 remains the most efficient tool. But for those seeking broader flexibility (or wanting to balance education with retirement) alternatives can play a supporting role.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories: