- New federal rules will limit graduate borrowing to $100,000 for most programs and $200,000 for a small set of “professional degrees,” including medicine, dentistry, and law.
- Social media posts claimed the Department of Education had “excluded” nursing from professional-degree status, however, the agency’s latest FAQ disputes those claims.
- The Department says 95% of nursing students borrow below the new limits and argues that caps may push down runaway graduate tuition.
The Department of Education moved this week to counter a wave of online claims about how the federal government will classify nursing programs under new student loan limits taking effect next year.
The guidance, released in a post titled “Myth vs. Fact: The Definition of Professional Degrees“, attempts to clarify how the term “professional degree” will be used under President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and why certain nursing programs are not included in the category eligible for the highest borrowing cap.
The answer, the agency insists, has little to do with whether nursing is considered “professional” and everything to do with how federal loan limits have ballooned over time.
Why Student Loan Borrowing Categories Are Changing
Under the OBBBA, Congress instructed the Department to create student loan borrowing limits that distinguish between graduate programs and professional programs.
For nearly two decades, all types of graduate students have been allowed to borrow up to the full cost of attendance through a combination of unsubsidized Direct Loans and Graduate PLUS loans. That open-ended borrowing authority helped fuel substantial tuition growth in many fields, the Department argues, contributing to a federal portfolio that now totals about $1.7 trillion.
The OBBBA ended the Grad PLUS loan program, and then capped graduate Direct Loan borrowing with a two-tiered cap system:
- $200,000 lifetime cap for a limited group of “professional degrees,” such as medicine (M.D.), dentistry (D.D.S./D.M.D.), and law (J.D.).
- $100,000 lifetime cap for all other graduate and doctoral programs, including advanced nursing degrees.
Undergraduate borrowers are largely unaffected, with the exception of Parent PLUS loans facing new caps as well.
A negotiated rulemaking committee (comprised of higher-education stakeholders) reached a consensus earlier this month on which degrees would qualify for the higher cap. That consensus is defined here: Graduate vs. Professional Degrees by CIP Program Code.
Why Nursing Isn’t Listed As A “Professional” Degree
The FAQ pushes back on one of the most viral claims: that the Department “does not consider nurses to be professionals.” The agency calls this a misunderstanding of the term.
As the Department frames it, “professional degree” is an internal category used only to determine which programs are eligible for the higher borrowing ceiling. It does not reflect a judgment on the social, clinical, or economic value of the degrees. In other words, the term is administrative, not symbolic.
Nursing programs have wide variation in tuition, cost structure, and length. Most do not approach the price tag of a medical or dental program, which can exceed $200,000 in tuition alone.
The FAQ also highlighted “that the loan limits are limited to graduate programs and have no impact on undergraduate nursing programs, including four-year bachelor’s of science in nursing degrees and two-year associate’s degrees in nursing. 80% of the nursing workforce does not have a graduate degree.”
The Department cites its own data showing that 95% of nursing students borrow below the new limits, suggesting that most nursing students in the field should have enough federal borrowing capacity even under the lowered caps.
Impact On Students And The Nursing Workforce
Concerns about the nursing shortage have circulated widely, especially in online discussions that interpreted the new structure as a financial barrier to advanced practice training. The Department addresses those fears directly.
According to the FAQ:
- The caps do not affect undergraduate nursing education, including associate and bachelor’s programs.
- Roughly 80% of the nursing workforce does not hold a graduate degree, meaning the majority of practicing nurses will see no change in borrowing access.
- Most current graduate nursing students borrow within the new limits.
Still, nursing leaders have raised broader concerns not addressed by the FAQ: the possibility that cost pressures could influence program availability, stifle long-term workforce growth, or shift financial burdens onto employers. Because many advanced practice roles (such as nurse practitioners) require graduate degrees, even a small share of students exceeding the cap could face barriers if program tuition remains high.
The Department, however, frames the caps as a cost-control mechanism. By reducing the amount students can borrow with federal loans, the agency argues colleges will face pressure to reduce tuition for higher-priced graduate programs.
What This Means For Future Nursing Students
For students planning to pursue an M.S.N., D.N.P., or post-graduate certificate, the changes may alter how they finance their studies but are unlikely to block access to federal loans altogether.
Here are the immediate takeaways:
- Most graduate nursing students should remain within federal borrowing caps, based on Department data.
- Students in high-cost programs may need to consider a mix of federal loans, employer tuition support, state aid, or private loans if their tuition substantially exceeds the new $100,000 limit.
- Tuition may fluctuate in the coming years as programs adjust to capped federal lending.
- The definition of “professional degree” may evolve once the final rule is published and public comments are reviewed.
Students entering programs in fall of 2026 or later should monitor announcements closely, particularly regarding financial aid changes.
Looking Ahead
The nursing shortage remains a pressing workforce challenge. The question now is whether the new federal caps will rein in costs, as the Department hopes, or introduce friction in a training pipeline that could exacerbate existing shortages.
The public comment period will likely serve as a key venue for nursing associations, universities, and employers to voice their concerns or support.
The final rule could look different depending on that feedback (though sadly, not likely), but the core message from the Department this week is simple: contrary to viral claims, the policy is not a judgment on the nursing profession.
Don’t Miss These Other Stories:
